Paper #591

Título:

Processes and consequences in business ethical dilemmas: The oil industry and climate changes

Autores:

Marc Le Menestrel, Sybille van den Hove y Henri Claude de Bettignies

Fecha:

Noviembre 2001

Resumen:

This paper proposes a framework to examine business ethical dilemmas and business attitudes towards such dilemmas. Business ethical dilemmas can be understood as reflecting a contradiction between a socially detrimental process and a self-interested profitable consequence. This representation allows us to distinguish two forms of behavior differing by whether priority is put on consequences or on processes. We argue that these forms imply very different business attitudes towards society: controversial or competitive for the former and aligned or cooperative for the latter. These attitudes are then analyzed at the discursive level in order to address the question of good faith in business argumentation, i.e. to which extent are these attitudes consistent with actual business behaviors. We argue that consequential attitudes mostly involve communication and lobbying actions aiming at eluding the dilemma. Therefore, the question of good faith for consequential attitudes lies in the consistency between beliefs and discourse. On the other hand, procedural attitudes acknowledge the dilemma and claim a change of the process of behavior. They thus raise the question of the consistency between discourses and actual behavior. We apply this processes/consequences framework to the case of the oil industry�s climate change ethical dilemma which comes forth as a dilemma between �emitting greenhouse gases� and �making more profits�. And we examine the different attitudes of two oil corporations-BP Amoco and ExxonMobil-towards the dilemma.

Palabras clave:

Business ethical dilemma, procedural rationality, consequential rationality, oil industry, climate change, Kyoto protocol

Códigos JEL:

M14, Q2

Área de investigación:

Economía de la Empresa y Organización Industrial

Publicado en:

Climate Policy, 41, 3, (2002), pp. 251-266

Descargar el paper en formato PDF