Paper #1807
- Títol:
- Non-standard errors
- Autors:
- Albert J. Menkveld, Anna Dreber, Felix Holzmeister, Juergen Huber, Magnus Johannesson, Michael Kirchler, Sebastian Neussüs, Michael Razen, Utz Weitzel, Christian T. Brownlees, Javier Gil-Bazo i et al.
- Data:
- Desembre 2021
- Resum:
- In statistics, samples are drawn from a population in a data-generating process (DGP). Standard errors measure the uncertainty in sample estimates of population parameters. In science, evidence is generated to test hypotheses in an evidence-generating process (EGP). We claim that EGP variation across researchers adds uncertainty: non-standard errors. To study them, we let 164 teams test six hypotheses on the same sample. We find that non-standard errors are sizeable, on par with standard errors. Their size (i) co-varies only weakly with team merits, reproducibility, or peer rating, (ii) declines significantly after peer-feedback, and (iii) is underestimated by participants.
- Paraules clau:
- non-standard errors, multi-analyst approach, liquidity
- Codis JEL:
- C12, C18, G1, G14
- Àrea de Recerca:
- Finances i Comptabilitat
Descarregar el paper en format PDF