Tornar a Working Papers

Paper #1432

Agricultural risk and the spread of religious communities
Philipp Ager i Antonio Ciccone
Juliol 2014 (Revisió: Octubre 2016)
Building on the idea that members of religious communities insure each other against some idiosyncratic risks, we argue that religious communities should be more widespread where populations face greater common risk. Our argument builds on idiosyncratic and common risks aggravating each other. This implies that individuals have a greater incentive to mutually insure against idiosyncratic risk when greater common risk makes the worst case scenario of bad realizations of common and idiosyncratic risks more likely. Our empirical analysis exploits rainfall risk as a source of common agricultural risk in the nineteenth-century United States. We show that a greater share of the population was organized in religious communities in counties with greater rainfall risk. The link between rainfall risk and membership in religious communities is stronger among more agricultural counties and counties exposed to greater rainfall risk during the growing season. We also find that among the historically more agricultural counties, more than 1/3 of nineteenth-century differences in religious membership associated with rainfall risk persist to the turn of the twenty-first century.
Paraules clau:
Religious community membership, agricultural risk, informal insurance.
Codis JEL:
Z12, O13, N31.
Àrea de Recerca:
Macroeconomia i Economia Internacional

Descarregar el paper en format PDF (1.696 Kb)

Cercar Working Papers

Per data:
-cal seleccionar un valor a les quatre llistes desplegables-

Consultes Predefinides